Abstract Background Carotid arteries are frequently the site of pathologies, the most common being atherosclerosis, which may result in the formation of plaques, causing stenosis. Doppler ultrasound is currently the exam of choice for assessment of the carotid arteries in asymptomatic patients to screen for and diagnose vascular lesions. Current guidelines recommend screening patients who have risk factors for carotid stenosis and who are able and willing to undergo medical treatment and/or carotid intervention. Screening asymptomatic patients in the general adult population who have no significant risk factors is not recommended. Objectives To assess whether medical experts rely on the literature to request Doppler ultrasound for screening. Methods A retrospective selection of patients was performed based on requests for carotid ultrasound. The data collected were computed and analyzed using RStudio version 1.3.959. Results The request was evaluated as appropriate as long as the patients presented at least one risk factor for carotid plaques. Fifty-five out of 152 patients met criteria for carotid screening. The most frequent indication in the study population was vascular check-up. Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor. Vascular surgery specialists were more likely to order the exam correctly (odds ratio for correct indications: 3.52 [CI 1.14 - 10.87], with p=0.02). The rate of correct Doppler ultrasound requests was 36% (95%CI 29 to 42%). Conclusions An excess of requests for carotid ultrasound screening was found in this study. Vascular surgeons more often requested the test correctly.

Resumo Contexto Artérias carótidas são locais de frequentes patologias, sendo a mais comum a aterosclerose, podendo resultar na formação de placas com estenose. Para avaliarmos as carótidas em pacientes assintomáticos, o método de ultrassonografia Doppler ou ecodoppler é, atualmente, o exame de eleição, indicado para a triagem e o diagnóstico de lesões vasculares. As diretrizes atuais recomendam o rastreamento em pacientes que apresentem fatores de risco para estenose carotídea e que estejam aptos e dispostos ao tratamento medicamentoso/intervenção carotídea. A triagem em pacientes assintomáticos na população adulta em geral e sem fatores de risco significativos não é recomendada. Objetivos Avaliar se os especialistas médicos se baseiam na literatura para solicitar o ecodoppler como screening. Métodos Realizou-se seleção retrospectiva dos pacientes a partir da solicitação de ecodoppler. Os dados coletados foram computados e analisados com o programa RStudio versão 1.3.959. Resultados Avaliou-se a solicitação como adequada, desde que os pacientes apresentassem pelo menos um fator de risco para placas carotídeas. Entre 152 pacientes, 55 preenchiam critérios para screening de carótidas, a principal indicação na população estudada foi o check-up vascular. Hipertensão arterial foi o fator de risco mais prevalente. Os especialistas em cirurgia vascular obtiveram êxito maior ao solicitar o exame de maneira adequada [razão de chances de indicações corretas de 3,52 (IC 1,14-10,87), com p = 0,02]. A assertividade nas indicações de ecodoppler foi de 36% (IC95% 29-42%). Conclusões Conclui-se que houve excesso de solicitação de ultrassonografia de carótidas como screening. Os cirurgiões vasculares solicitaram o exame de maneira mais assertiva.

Abstract Introduction: Vasculitides are diseases usually caused by the deposition of immune complexes in the vascular endothelium, triggering inflammation with or without vessel necrosis. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis affects small-caliber vessels, especially venules, it’s treatment can be long and complex and the condition may become extended when not followed correctly. This paper aims to report a form of vasculitis that manifests itself, among other forms, through skin ulcers, focusing on the clinical approach of the phenomenon and disease. Case report: Female patient, 54 years old, presenting chronic venous disease and acute leukocytoclastic vasculitis, associated with persistent ulcers, pruritus and paresthesia that affected both legs and feet. The treatment, based on the use of vasodilators, corticoids and oral antibiotics, followed by dressings with antimicrobial action on the lesions, led to a complete remission of the wounds and reduction of symptoms within 6 months. As for the venous disease, radiofrequency thermoablation of saphenous veins was performed in association with phlebectomy of tributary veins, leading to significant improvement of the swelling and local paresthesia. Conclusion: The treatment of patients with cutaneous ulcers associated with vasculitis demands the use of several medications and tends to be long-term. Patient’s compliance is extremely important for improving the prognosis of the disease. In addition, radiofrequency thermoablation is shown to be an effective and safe option for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins, with less recurrence of cutaneous ulcers compared to surgery.

Resumo A variação do valor encontrado nos exames de creatinina em pacientes submetidos à tomografia computadorizada (TC) contrastada tem sido utilizada como método prático para a avaliação de possíveis lesões renais causadas pelo uso do contraste. Entre os critérios, considera-se o aumento absoluto de creatinina sérica ≥ 0,5 mg/dL ou relativo em ≥ 25% para possíveis distúrbios renais, como a nefropatia induzida por contraste (NIC). Nosso objetivo foi analisar a incidência de NIC através de uma metanálise envolvendo nove artigos relacionados à incidência de lesão renal por contraste, sendo calculado o odds ratio (OR) e o intervalo de confiança (IC95%) por meio do programa RStudio. A incidência de NIC em pacientes submetidos a TC foi de 11,29%, sendo o OR de 1,38 (IC95% 0,88–2,16). Contrastes não iônicos apresentam maior segurança em seu uso que outros tipos de contraste, e o volume maior que 115 mL pode estar relacionado a NIC. A doença renal prévia apresentou significado estatístico em agravar a NIC.

Abstract Variation in the creatinine levels of patients who have undergone contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has been adopted as a practical method for assessment of possible kidney damage caused by the contrast. Criteria employed include an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase ≥ 25% as indicative of possible renal disorders, such as contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Our objective was to analyze the incidence of CIN by means of a meta-analysis of nine articles related to incidence of kidney damage caused by contrast, calculating odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (95%CI) using RStudio. The overall incidence of CIN in patients who had CT scans was 11.29%, with an OR of 1.38 (95%CI 0.88–2.16). Non-ionic contrasts are safer than other types of contrast, and volumes exceeding 115 mL may be associated with CIN. Preexisting kidney disease had a statistically significant relationship with worse CIN rates.